Dragos Dima vs Cihan Akay Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L W W L
Form
W W W L L L W L L LHead-2-Head: Dima 1 - 0 Akay
They have played 2 sets in total, with Dima winning 2 and Akay winning 0. The last match between Dima and Akay was at the M15 Antalya, 31-10-2022, Q2 round, Clay with Dragos Dima getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dragos Dima | 1 |
| Cihan Akay | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Dragos Dima
Player
Cihan Akay
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
26
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:1:0 | Average Match Time | 1:1:0 |
| 69% (22/32) | 1st Serve % | 72% (39/54) |
| 95% (21/22) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (17/39) |
| 70% (7/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (5/15) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (32/54) | Return Points Win % | 13% (4/32) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dragos Dima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Dragos Dima
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
83
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 7-6(4) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dragos Dima
Player
Rik Muller
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Dragos Dima
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
22%
(
4 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dragos Dima
Player
Cihan Akay
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Dragos Dima
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dragos Dima
Player
Lucio Carnevalle
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dragos Dima
Player
Mathieu Perchicot
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dragos Dima
Player
Mikhail Fufygin
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Cihan Akay Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Haydar Cem Gokpinar
Player
Cihan Akay
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Dayne Kelly
Player
Cihan Akay
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kazuki Nishiwaki
Player
Cihan Akay
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cihan Akay
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
100%
(
39 of
39)
1st Serve %
100%
(
39 of
39)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Cihan Akay
Player
Enzo Aguiard
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (282/181) | Win/Loss | 41% (43/61) |
| 59% (623/427) | Sets Win/Loss | 43% (98/131) |
| 54% (5072/4240) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (989/1076) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 324 | Aces Total | 54 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 486 | Total Double Faults | 61 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 558.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 197.46 |
| 66% (12326/18694) | 1st Serve % | 71% (1289/1810) |
| 63% (7781/12326) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (725/1289) |
| 50% (3158/6368) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (231/521) |
| 47% (1155/2446) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (77/190) |
| 45% (8588/18902) | Return Points Win % | 41% (685/1658) |
| 61% (277/454) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (41/102) |
| 50% (3/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (42/76) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 27% (3/11) |
| 51% (61/119) | Deciding Set Win % | 39% (9/23) |
| 90% (286/256) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (49/40) |
| 10% (286/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (49/9) |
| 14% (177/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (55/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
